Armstrong S1 Review: A Comprehensive Test of new S1 Wings
Armstrong's brand new S1 setup has hit the market, and we were eager to put it to the test behind the boat. We explored three different front wing sizes—the 1850, 1550, and 1250—each paired with a 300 tail wing.
Our goal was to evaluate these new wings using Armstrong's new alloy mast and fuselage. Here's our detailed review to help you decide which foil best suits your experience and skill level.
Testing the 1850 Wing
Our first test featured the 1850 wing with a 65 cm fuselage and a 72 cm mast, mounted on a 122 cm WKT board. We set the foil tracks in a moderately forward position to balance the substantial lift provided by the large wing. Here's what we found:
Stability: The 1850 wing provided exceptional stability, making it ideal for beginners. It had a remarkably low stall speed, allowing for smooth transitions even at low velocities.
Lift: The large wing generated a significant amount of lift, which was beneficial for learning but felt slightly cumbersome for advanced maneuvers.
Performance: While the 1850 wing excelled in stability, its size made it less agile and harder to maneuver. It’s a great choice for those new to foiling or for riders seeking a stable and forgiving setup.
Testing the 1550 Wing
Next, we switched to the 1550 wing, expecting a blend of performance and stability. This setup also included the alloy mast and fuselage, and here’s how it performed:
Agility: The 1550 wing was noticeably more nimble than the 1850. It offered a good balance between stability and maneuverability, making it a versatile option for intermediate riders.
Efficiency: This wing proved to be quite efficient through the water, maintaining stability without sacrificing performance. It handled transitions smoothly and allowed for better pumping and gliding.
Comparison to Carbon Setup: Interestingly, the difference between the alloy and a full carbon setup was minimal. The 1550 alloy setup performed admirably behind the boat, making it a cost-effective alternative to higher-end carbon options.
Testing the 1250 Wing
Finally, we tested the 1250 wing, expecting it to cater more to advanced riders due to its smaller size. Here’s our assessment:
Lift and Stability: Despite its smaller size, the 1250 wing generated ample lift. It maintained a good balance, offering stability without compromising on agility.
Advanced Performance: The 1250 wing had a tighter turning radius, making it excellent for front wave foiling and more advanced maneuvers. It’s suitable for lighter riders or those looking to refine their skills.
Customizations: We experimented with the Flow 235 tail wing, which added a new dimension to the setup by loosening it up for advanced riders. However, even with the 300 tail wing, the setup remained highly enjoyable and functional.
Overall Impressions
The Armstrong S1 setup with alloy mast and INF fuselage delivers outstanding value for money. It caters to both beginners and intermediate riders, providing a cost-effective entry into the sport without sacrificing performance. Here are our key takeaways:
1850 Wing: Best for beginners due to its stability and low stall speed. Ideal for learning and cruising.
1550 Wing: A versatile choice for intermediate riders, balancing stability and maneuverability. Suitable for a wide range of conditions.
1250 Wing: Geared towards advanced riders and lighter individuals. Offers excellent performance for tight turns and wave foiling.
Whether you’re new to foiling or looking to upgrade your setup, the Armstrong S1 offers a range of configurations to match your needs. Visit our store to try a demo or check out the full range on our website today!